add gravity leads to instability, bifurcation 3D, multiphase, particles
OpenLB – Open Source Lattice Boltzmann Code › Forums › on OpenLB › General Topics › add gravity leads to instability, bifurcation 3D, multiphase, particles
 This topic has 10 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 4 years, 6 months ago by mgaedtke.

AuthorPosts

October 16, 2019 at 8:11 am #4590Manuel BergerParticipant
Dear all!
I have modified the bifurcation example (olb1.3r1/example/particles/bifurcation3d) to simulate gravitation effects. The simulations is stable without gravitation, but when I apply g = 9.81 m/s^2 I have no chance to get a reasonable result. Gravity is transformed to lattice units by gLB = g * dt*dt/dx where dt is the physical time step size of one iteration and dx is the lattice spacing. Additionally, I have changed the boundary conditions to a constant inlet velocity and the outlets are set to ambient pressure.
The implementation of gravity is in the code lines 180 and 181.
The code, stlfile and logfile is available at:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/dah69crhc2a8tgz/AACj3XTxFFcbkpx05TuOQqM3a?dl=0
Thanks for the feedback and advices
Manuel Berger
October 16, 2019 at 8:47 am #4591mathiasKeymasterDear Manuel,
here are some hints:
1/ Use the converter to convert quanteties in lattice units. You need accelation insteed of forces – see the other examples dealing with forces like poiseuilleXd.
2/ You should Buoyancy forces.
3/ Strating with a working and stable example, change one thing, get a stable result, then change the next thing. So dont change boundary conditions as well as introducing a force at once.Best
MathiasOctober 16, 2019 at 11:12 am #4592Manuel BergerParticipantDear Mathias!
Thanks for the fast response and the hints:
1/ I have used the converter to convert quantities into lattice units (i.e. gravitation code line 174)
T gLB= gravity*converter.getPhysDeltaT()*converter.getPhysDeltaT()/converter.getPhysDeltaX();
I have also used the poiseuilleXd file as a starting point. However, it shows how to apply a body force, but not how the body force is connected to gravitation. I think in the LB framework OpenLB, there is so far no code that shows this connection. The LB framework palabos (palabosv2.0r0\examples\showCases\vofMultiPhase\damBreak3d.cpp) shows that body force and gravitation (in lattice units) is the same. Code line 70,71. I assume my implementation of gravitation is fine in the bifurcation3d (see dropbox)?
2/ You are right Buoyancy forces are not considered.
3/ I get already a stable simulation result with changed boundary conditions (without gravitation). Adding gravity (1 thing changed) does not work.
I would be great if you could find a specific mistake in my code or recommendation i could change.
Thanks you very much for the help in advance
Manuel Berger
October 16, 2019 at 11:39 am #4593mathiasKeymasterDear Manuel,
there are methods of the unitConverter which does the job. The factor should be
latticeForce = physForceGivenInSiUnits*converter.getConversionFactorMass()/converter.getConversionFactorForce();
Best
MathiasPS we will have a lecture on that in our next spring school given by Timm Krüger
October 16, 2019 at 12:53 pm #4594Manuel BergerParticipantDear Mathias,
I have already registered for the spring school in Berlin.
I have tried your conversion factor and found out that
converter.getConversionFactorMass()/converter.getConversionFactorForce();
is equal to
converter.getPhysDeltaT()*converter.getPhysDeltaT()/converter.getPhysDeltaX();
thus, my conversion is also fine.
The only question that still remains, which is independent of this code line is: How to convert gravitational acceleration (9.81 m/s^2) to body force? – or is it the same?
Thanks a lot!
Best
ManuelOctober 16, 2019 at 1:05 pm #4595mgaedtkeKeymasterHi Manuel,
the force field in OpenLB is actually a force over reference density, thus it is equivalent to an acceleration. To convert your gravitational acceleration you can use the term
converter.getPhysDeltaT()*converter.getPhysDeltaT()/converter.getPhysDeltaX()
See you at the Spring School!
Best,
MaxOctober 16, 2019 at 1:44 pm #4596Manuel BergerParticipantHi Max,
thanks for the explanation. Thus, my implementation of gravity is correct. See you at the Spring School!
Now I have to find a way to make this simulation numerically stable. Any recommendations based on personal experience for boundaries? So far I made the experience that increasing the resolution N helps sometimes, but with the disadvantage that the computational time increases dramatically.
Boundaries for numerical stability would be interested for: (in brackets are the used values)
gravitational force in lattice units (0.0187673)
latticeRelaxationTime (0.557646)
maximum velocity in lattice units (0.0505667)
maybe lattice viscosity
….What are the steps you do, do make a LB simulation numerically stable.
Thanks a lot!
Best
Manuel This reply was modified 4 years, 6 months ago by Manuel Berger.
October 16, 2019 at 5:37 pm #4598mathiasKeymaster1/ Check if the carrier phase simulation is stable
>if not, choose a smaller mesh size or use a smagorinsky model until it becomes a stable setup
2/ Check if the particle phase is stabel
> if not, choose a even smaller mesh size or choose a bigger diffusion coefficient until it becomes a stable setupMathias
October 16, 2019 at 7:18 pm #4599Manuel BergerParticipantDear Mathias,
thank you very much!
Best,
ManuelOctober 17, 2019 at 12:54 am #4600zshi6193ParticipantDear Max,
You mention the force field in OpenLB is actually a force over reference density. For multiphase flow, I have two phases (liquid and vapor via using single component ShanChen model). If I define a force field (an acceleration) into the whole domain, will this method still works?
I am just thinking that vapor tends to have very small acceleration because of very small density. Or this method can only be used twocomponent ShanChen model.Thanks for your help.
SimonOctober 17, 2019 at 1:58 pm #4602mgaedtkeKeymasterHi Simon,
yes, this will still work. Just check the examples/multiComponent/rayleighTaylor2d/ or 3d
Best,
Max 
AuthorPosts
 You must be logged in to reply to this topic.