Hello!
I was trying to understand the implementation of the example: example/thermal/stefanMelting2d.
Reference: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2015.03.064.
The literature has reported that Chapman-Enskog expansion is adopted to recover the Navier-Stokes equations to LBM. Referring to the thermal component, we may obtain the lattice thermal conductivity:
\lambda = cs^2 (\tau – 0.5) dt C_p,
It is quite similar to the recovery of the fluid viscosity:
\nu = cs^2 (\tau – 0.5) dt.
My question is about whether cs is defined as c/3 or 1/3.
Since the expansion is like:
f(x+c*dt, t+dt) – f(x,t) = -(f(x,t) – feq(x,t))/ \tau,
And c=dx/dt due to discretized physical space and time.
My point is maybe c cannot be simplified to 1, even though I understand that
c=1 is convenient to get the zero- or first-moment of feq equivalently (term of c canceled out).
Another question may be whether the physical pressure should be recovered as:
p = \rho /3 or p = \rho * c^2 /3
Thank you very much if you can correct me or leave some comments.