Skip to content

Periodic Outlet Boundary Conditions ( nonequilibrium extrapolation method)

OpenLB – Open Source Lattice Boltzmann Code Forums on OpenLB General Topics Periodic Outlet Boundary Conditions ( nonequilibrium extrapolation method)

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 36 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #7324
    Henderson_C
    Participant

    Hello everyone,

    I was wondering how OpenLB tackles the migration of certain object (droplet, bubbles, ….) through the domain outlet. I read some papers, and many has recommended the use of nonequilibrium extrapolation method. Is there an implementation of such method in OpenLB?

    Regards,

    #7325
    FBukreev
    Keymaster

    Hello,

    we have particle counter by the Lagrangian particles and the mass counter by Eulerian particles at the outlet. Which one do you want to use?

    Greetings
    Fedor

    #7326
    Henderson_C
    Participant

    Dear Fedor,

    Thank you for replying. Can you elaborate on the difference between them?

    Thanks

    #7327
    FBukreev
    Keymaster

    In first case you track the separate points moving with Newtonian equation system and in the Eulerian case you regard particles as a concentration cloud.

    #7328
    Henderson_C
    Participant

    Dear Fedor,

    Can you show me both implementations as I am now indecisive of which method to use.

    #7329
    FBukreev
    Keymaster

    Look in the examples/particles/bifurcation/eulerLagrange and eulerEuler. There you can see it clear.

    #7332
    Henderson_C
    Participant

    Dear Fedor,

    I want the particle to move to the flow inlet when it passes through the flow domain outlet. I have set the periodicity to true, but when the particle touches the outlet, it sticks to the outlet wall.

    regards,

    • This reply was modified 1 year, 8 months ago by Henderson_C.
    #7334
    FBukreev
    Keymaster

    Which particles do you use? Lagrangian or Eulerian? If you have set the periodicity on the particle Lattice there must be no outlet and inlet at all.

    #7335
    Henderson_C
    Participant

    Dear Fedor,

    I am not using the super particle system. I am simply using the single particle simulation. The particle is flowing through a channel with an inlet and outlet. To achieve fully hydrodynamic condition, I set the periodicity in the x-direction to be true (cuboidGeometry.setPeriodicity(false, true)). I thought once I enable this feature, any flow interruption due to the particle motion (Brownian motion) beside the outlet will be shown in the inlet of the channel. But that is not the case.

    #7336
    FBukreev
    Keymaster

    Hello,

    dou you simulate the resolved moving particle?

    #7337
    Henderson_C
    Participant

    Dear Fedor,

    Yes, similar to one used in dkt2d example.

    regards,

    • This reply was modified 1 year, 8 months ago by Henderson_C.
    #7339
    FBukreev
    Keymaster

    You can add the periodicity vector (false,true) at the end of the ParticleManager, look also at the ParticleManger code in src.

    #7340
    Henderson_C
    Participant

    Dear Fedor,

    By that you mean modify the source code (src/particles/particlemanager) with the periodicity vector?

    regards,

    #7341
    FBukreev
    Keymaster

    I mean that you can look at the parameters of the particlemanager in the src and than put the periodicity vector as argument on the right place in the particlemanager declaration in your simulation setup.

    #7342
    Henderson_C
    Participant

    Dear Fedor,

    I am not developer not I am expert in c++ but to understand correctly, I need to modify the ParticleManager constructor to accept the periodicity vector as an argument, and initialize the periodicity member variable with it. Is that correct? When you mention the parameters, what do you mean exactly? I am really confused on how to solve my issue.

    Your continuous support is really appreciated.
    Regards,

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 36 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.