Henderson_C
Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Henderson_CParticipant
Dear FBukreev,
Alright I got it from another forum.
Thanks
Henderson_CParticipantDear FBukreev,
Can you explain more specifically.
Regards,
- This reply was modified 1 year, 3 months ago by Henderson_C. Reason: Wrong spelling
Henderson_CParticipantDear Dr. Mathias,
If I attend the spring workshop will I be able to solve my problem? The basics of the OpenLB software I genuinely understand thats why I am asking.
Best regards,
Henderson_CParticipantDear Dr. Mathias,
My Master’s thesis has the element of heat transfer in particles. So, I need to find out a way to implement that. I am requesting some hints and simple guidance, or else I will not be able to carry on with my work. Here is my email if you or anyone would like to discuss more. (Henderson_carl@outlook.com)
Sincerely,
Henderson_CParticipantHello Dr. Mathias,
Is this achievable by modifying the header files (i.e., particleTasks.h) or the main code? Please elaborate on your hypothesis. My Master’s Thesis is related to such a topic, so I find your replies very helpful.
Sincerely,
Henderson_CParticipantDear Mathias,
Thank you for your reply.
The particles are moving not fixed. I am struggling to give the particle thermophysical properties such as the thermal conductivity. Maybe I am missing a point so please bare with me. The material number is defined in the prepare geometry section but the particle is created in the main loop in the example (DKT2D) so no material number is assigned to it. So how can I assign it a material number?Your support is highly appreciated.
Best regards,
Henderson_CParticipantDear Nicolas,
Thank you for your valuable comments and patience with my questions. I now understand it clearly. I am excited to come to the Spring school but unfortunately, I can not due to some circumstances. However, I have one more question if you do not mind. How can I employ certain physics in the particle such as the DD enthalpy-based scheme?
Best regards,
Henderson_CParticipantDear Nicolas,
As per your recommendation, I have switched to a 3D particle sedimentation but I still obtain incorrect results. Can you advise me on which parameters are of importance regarding this simulation? I am keeping the relaxation time above 0.5 and the spacing seems adequate. I apologize if my questions are still as I am new to this topic. Thank you very much.
Best regards,
Henderson_CParticipantDear Nicolas,
Thank you for your reply. I am aware that the domain must be large enough for the particle to achieve the maximum velocity. But I did not understand the point regarding using consistent parameters. The paper you attached, validated the one-particle sedimentation, however, using the same inputs (Particle radius, particle density, …) I obtain a different output.
-
AuthorPosts